
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Offering a Helping Hand

The Dirtiest Job in America
Monday, November 17, 2008
Putting yourself in their shoes
- The card-sorting exercise was fun, and made me question how I group different elements of news. I had never really thought about how everything fits together. It was a lot harder to organize than I thought it would be. But in the end I felt a kind of accomplishment at putting everything in groups that I thought made sense.
- The surveys were detailed but sometimes confusing. Although they had good questions like ranking the importance of news, I thought that some of the questions asked similar things.
- The observation of classmates' surfing was really fun. I felt somewhat like a human Poynter tracker. But I don't feel like a 5-minute period offers the chance to show enough information about a reader's daily routine.
I am a grinder. This kind of reader is someone who is very loyal to their news organizations and has specific criteria for where they get their news. I definitely agree with my placement in that category because I don't check a lot of news sources. I mainly read the Los Angeles Times because I'm just used to it.
The card sorting exercise was hard because some of the news subjects seemed to stand alone. There are many topics that are unique and do not fit with others smoothly. But our group discussed the reasons why the subjects might fit in one category or another, and ultimately came to a well-negotiated result. I think a group can best figure out what works because they usually have different opinions, which is what the general public is made up of: different opinions.
Is this information useful?
A little opinion goes a long way
- A discussion intro
- Lots of surveys
- Card sorting
- Observation of surfing habits
Behind The Scenes
How would you define User Experience Research?
User Experience Research is a study on the user/viewer's interaction with various components of a website. Whether through habits or interests, the behavior of the user on a particular website allows web designers to determine what is effective or attractive to their viewers. It is essential to discover what will garner more attention to the site; the more traffic, the more potential there is for ad revenue.
The research conducted and feedback gathered can help anywhere from the appearance of the website to the layout of certain information. It is also important for online media to analyze user behavior and experience because it reveals a lot about their personality and lifestyle; aspects that they can use to cater their information to.
Last Tuesday, the User Research Experience team at the L.A. Times came into the Journalism 446 classroom and conducted a session that determined what type of news junkie we are. Through several surveys, questionnaires, and question-and-answers, the team was able to see where different students stood in terms of being a certain type of news gatherer.
The information gathered also helped them understand what the demographics of college students are looking into. From the session, they can deduce what students my age are following (interest, attraction to a picture or headline, relevance to life, etc).
The research helped discover:
-what interests the user
-particular attractions (picture, headline, video, etc)
-the frequency in which one goes on the site
-the length of time one stays on a page
-the times in the day in which one uses the internet
-the behavior in which users go about finding news (through a particular subject matter, loyalty to a site, or overall interest in news)
What type of news junkie are you?
From the behaviors, students were categorized into being a news hound, a scanner, or a grinder. Only Hannah and I were placed in the "scanners" category because, from our survey, they saw that our habits were more to get a general knowledge of news rather than leaning toward a particular subject (sports, cooking) or trying to understand local news at certain peak hours of the day. We peruse everywhere and pick and choose what we click on simply out of interest.
I thought my label was extremely accurate. I tend to not care for one specific subject, and I have no loyalty to one publication, which permits me to roam several websites, reading just about anything.
What does your "label" reflect?
After being divided into groups, the L.A Times U.E.R team gave each group a stack of flashcards with various topics such as "Politics," "Technology," and "Hollywood A-Z." They requested that we categorize the cards into matching groups. This process allows them to see what our thought process is like. If we grouped "Entertainment" with "Blogging," it suggests to them that we see a correlation between the two and that we might expect to see bl
ogs in the entertainment section. Since there were only two members in the group, deciding which topics belonged to what group was not difficult.
Through all the information gathered, web designers and product developers can determine what to put on a site, where to put it on a site, and how to catch and maintain a user's attention on the site. In return, traffic will grow, also increasing the number of sponsors or advertisements.
Overall, I thought the experience was really useful. I had no idea how much thought and effort goes into constructing/formatting a website. It was also interesting to learn the balance a news organization must maintain like making sure the fundamentals of journalism (ethics, integrity, timeliness, etc) remains a priority, but letting business (the source of employees' income, livelihood of company, etc) be a main component as well.
Photos - Courtesy of Creative Commons
Sunday, November 16, 2008
UER at USC

Research Exercises- Surveys-Most of them had a lot of questions, which made it so that we did not have a lot of time to spend thinking about each one. In this way, the answers reflected our initial reactions rather than allowing us to over-think the situation. The surveys will give the Los Angeles Times research team a sense of what type of news we prefer and where we usually go to get it.
- Categorizing news-Sorting the cards into appropriate categories was easier said than done. Some categories, like "video" and "photographs," seemed to belong everywhere whereas "religion" and "obituaries" did not really fit anywhere. Although my group came to an agreement, we made several compromises, which just shows that not everyone is going to be happy with the way latimes.com decides to organize its news. Of course, the goal of the research is to figure out how to make as much people happy as possible. The organization must be logical and comprehensive.
- Internet habits-It was weird to try to "act normal" for the Internet exercise when you had someone taking notes about your every move. Also, I don't normally just get online for the sole purpose of reading news for five minutes. I usually use the Internet to look something up and then periodically check on the news throughout my session online, so I did not feel like it was an accurate representation of my Internet habits.
Final Thoughts
For someone who uses latimes.com often, I liked the idea that my feedback might help to improve the Web site. User Experience Research is definitely valuable because know one knows what an audience wants better than the news consumers themselves. Of course, it is unrealistic to base all changes solely on user research. The exercises give researchers a glimpse into the online behaviors of potential site users, but the simulations and surveys are still nothing more than imitations of the real thing. It is also important to consider external factors that affect an individuals online news habits.
User Experience Research
Why is this important?
UER can give you valuable information into how users want the website to be like. If there are certain section they don't even visit or they hate how many ads there are, that's something an online news organization should know.
Thought on the Focus Group
Three of us would agree with where to put things. I don't know if that was because we think more similarly or we aren't really argumentative. Having a vocal group member who didn't agree with the others' decisions made the exercise harder. When observing the other groups, it seemed like we had more complications those around us. Despite this, we were fortunately able to finish the task.
User Experience Research

I thought the surveys were somewhat vague, and I wasn't sure how they would reveal anything significant about my Internet habits to the researchers. However, when I was placed in a grinder audience segment with three other girls for the card sorting exercise, I figured it must have given them some insight because we didn't have too much trouble agreeing on how to sort the cards.
This card sorting exercise was the most interesting to me because it helped me learn about myself at the same time that I learned about UER. My group had difficulty putting Religion and Obituaries into a category, and at one point we considered joining them, or perhaps joining "Religion" with "Sports" and "Home Teams," but eventually we decided to make them both orphans. Another difficulty was our Entertainment category. We did not know whether to join local entertainment sections with general entertainment ones. Eventually we decided to make them separate categories to facilitate a user's ability to find things to do in his or her city.
Observing my partner's internet habits was not extremely revealing because I have watched people surf the Web before. Also, I think people did not actually practice their normal Internet habits because they knew they were being watched.
I did not really agree with the audience segment I was placed in; however, I think that may be because I change my Internet habits on a regular basis. Sometimes I will go for days without checking the news online, other times I will check it incessantly. Sometimes I'll go to some sites regularly, other times I won't go to those sites at all. It just depends.
I think UER is valuable because without it, the people who organize online news sites would not necessarily be gearing their efforts toward pleasing the reader. However, it has the weaknesses I noted above. Overall it was a good learning experience.
Monday, November 10, 2008
What I Did, What I Will Do
I've always thought that statement was an accurate one. Learning languages is an obvious example - I learned to speak both Spanish and English like it was nothing when I was a little girl. But I've been studying French for years and I still haven't become fluent. That's why when I'm in class, I try to maintain the open mentality of a child. Otherwise, I never learn anything.

So. What did I learn from Story Project #1? I learned that bold subheads are highly effective for keeping a person's attention throughout a story. I learned that italics really do emphasize a point. And I also learned that links are very useful.
I tried my best to utilize all of these tactics in my last story, but I believe the story itself didn't lend itself very well to bolds or italics or links because it wasn't an opinion piece. It was a very objective description of what happened with chimps who had been used in invasive research, and I felt that emphasizing certain things in a visible way would be awkward.
For my next story project, I plan to cover a story that lends itself better to these things. I will also use a slideshow format instead of a gallery format for my photographs because I felt that they made other classmates' story projects more interesting.
That is all.
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Making Blogs Interactive
but I really liked how she had that slideshow of pictures in the upper right-hand corner. (This picture doesn't show the movement of the photos but I just wanted to point out its great location.)
It was also useful that the slideshow allowed you to pause or go back and forth between photos. These options give the reader control and also make the story interactive.
I think I just did it! This is exciting. Well hopefully I am on my way to making a great project.



